AW: Trump im Fadenkreuz der Medien
Ich glaube, Brennan hätte am liebsten ein CIA-Todesschwadron losgeschickt.Zitat von Pelle
Aber Trump gratuliert jetzt auch noch Putin. Wie kann er nur so einem schlechten Menschen gratulieren? Gerade jetzt, wo die Russlandermittlungen wirklich endgültig fast alles beweisen.
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
AW: Trump im Fadenkreuz der Medien
Trump ist ein doppelzüngiger Volldepp, er gratuliert Putin und gleichzeitig befiehlt er neue Strafzölle gegen Russland.Ich glaube, Brennan hätte am liebsten ein CIA-Todesschwadron losgeschickt.
Aber Trump gratuliert jetzt auch noch Putin. Wie kann er nur so einem schlechten Menschen gratulieren? Gerade jetzt, wo die Russlandermittlungen wirklich endgültig fast alles beweisen.
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
Deutsch wird groß geschrieben
Ausschwitz: Hier darf nichts über seine Gedenktafeln stehen
USrael: Der Schwanz Israel wedelt mit dem Hund USA
Quadrokopter in der Bibel: https://www.politikforen.net/showthread.php?186118
AW: Trump im Fadenkreuz der Medien
Creepy Uncle Joe macht wieder einen auf harter Kerl !
Trumps Antwort auf Twitter: "Crazy Joe Biden is trying to act like a tough guy. Actually, he is weak, both mentally and physically, and yet he threatens me, for the second time, with physical assault. He doesn’t know me, but he would go down fast and hard, crying all the way. Don’t threaten people Joe!"
Die tiefsten Brunnen tragen die höchsten Wasser - Meister Eckhart
AW: Trump im Fadenkreuz der Medien
Trump will mit Putin verhandeln.Trump ist ein doppelzüngiger Volldepp, er gratuliert Putin und gleichzeitig befiehlt er neue Strafzölle gegen Russland.
Es gibt so viele Themen, die man miteinander unter 4 Augen besprechen und abklaeren koennte.
Ich denke da vor allem an die Gefahr des Wettruestens, die Syrienkrise, den Iran, Hisbollah usw.
Ukraine natuerlich nicht zu vergessen.
Auch Israel koennte von den Gespraechen profitieren.
Es gibt aber leider NWO-Kraefte auch in Israel, die genau diese Verstaendigung der USA mit Russland verhindern und durchkreuzen wollen.
Trump ist jedenfalls zu einem Terffen mit Putin und engen Gespraechen bereit:
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
de.sputniknews.com/politik/20180320319998884-kontrolle-trump-putin-wettruesten/
Als Ort fuer diese Gespraeche koennte Serbien dienen. Belgard ist dazu bereit:
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
de.sputniknews.com/politik/20180322320016168-serbien-dacic-trump-putin-treffen/
“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.” –Prof. Caroll Quigley, Georgetown University, Tragedy and Hope (1966)
AW: Trump im Fadenkreuz der Medien
Im Gegensatz zu manchen israelischen NWOlern aus dem dortigen Bonzen-Establishment ist Trump sehr freundlich zu Putin:
Quelle:
Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
I called President Putin of Russia to congratulate him on his election victory (in past, Obama called him also). The Fake News Media is crazed because they wanted me to excoriate him. They are wrong! Getting along with Russia (and others) is a good thing, not a bad thing.......
7:56 PM - Mar 21, 2018
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/976532956557737984
Quelle:
Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
.....They can help solve problems with North Korea, Syria, Ukraine, ISIS, Iran and even the coming Arms Race. Bush tried to get along, but didn’t have the “smarts.” Obama and Clinton tried, but didn’t have the energy or chemistry (remember RESET). PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH!
8:05 PM - Mar 21, 2018
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/976535330835836929
“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.” –Prof. Caroll Quigley, Georgetown University, Tragedy and Hope (1966)
AW: Trump im Fadenkreuz der Medien
Derweil dreht Boris mit seiner Kinderei voellig durch:
Quelle:
To understand why 3 people lie stricken in Salisbury, look at Vladimir Putin’s actions inside Russia.
Yesterday he was proclaimed the winner of an election that resembled a coronation, complete with a triumphant ceremony outside the walls of the Kremlin. Mr Putin’s leading opponent had obviously been banned from standing and an abundance of CCTV footage appeared to show election officials nonchalantly stuffing ballot boxes.
One loyal functionary in Siberia used balloons in Russia’s national colours for the novel function of covering up a prying camera. “A choice without a real competition, as we have seen in this election, unfortunately is not a real choice,” was the verdict of the observer mission from the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
As he extends his grip on power, Mr Putin is taking his country in a dangerous direction. Throughout his rule he has eroded the liberties of the Russian people, tightened the screws of state repression and hunted down supposed foes.
When a leader starts behaving in this way then no-one should be surprised if many of his compatriots feel drawn to the example of countries that observe a different scale of values. They will notice that plenty of nations hold elections where no-one knows the result in advance. They will see how free societies in Europe, America and elsewhere thrive and prosper precisely because people are able to live as they choose, provided they do no harm.
They will understand how an independent media exposes the failings or evasions of democratic governments. And they will wonder why Russia cannot have the same? Mr Putin cannot give the straight answer, which is that he must deny Russia those freedoms in order to guarantee his perpetual rule. Instead, he has to send an emphatic message that asking awkward questions or turning against him carries a terrible price. Which brings us back to Salisbury. The use of a Russian military grade ‘Novichok’ nerve agent against Sergei Skripal and his daughter, Yulia, was very deliberate.
As Ken Clarke pointed out in Parliament last week, the obvious Russian-ness of the weapon was designed to send a signal to anyone pondering dissent amid the intensifying repression of Mr Putin’s Russia. The message is clear: we will hunt you down, we will find you and we will kill you – and though we will scornfully deny our guilt, the world will know that Russia did it.
There was a hint of this in Mr Putin’s first public response to Salisbury. He denied Russia’s culpability – of course – while carefully injecting a note of menace. “If it was military grade agent,” he said, “they would have died on the spot, obviously.”
Obviously. After all, he had already told state television that traitors would “kick the bucket” and “choke” on their “pieces of silver”. Yet the Kremlin, accustomed to a tame official media, is clearly struggling to get its story straight.
Since the Skripals and Detective Sergeant Nick Bailey were struck down on March 4, Russian officials and the state media have claimed variously that ‘Novichok’ never existed, or the stockpiles were destroyed, or they weren’t destroyed but mysteriously escaped to other countries.
Alexander Shulgin, the Russian Ambassador to The Hague, told Sky News: “I’ve never heard about this programme, about this Novichok agent. Never.” But his memory suddenly improved when he appeared on Russia Today and said that Novichok had been developed by the Soviet Union. “There never was such a programme under such a codename in the Russian Federation,” he said. “However, in Soviet times research began to produce a new generation of poisonous substances.”
This seemed to wrongfoot the Russian foreign ministry, whose spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, declared on the same day that neither Russia nor the Soviet Union had created Novichok. “This programme is not the creation of Russia or the Soviet Union,” she said, before disgracefully pointing the finger at Sweden, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, America – and inevitably the UK.
Meanwhile, other Russian officials have sought to conjure doubt and suspicion out of thin air. Alexander Yakovenko, the Russian Ambassador in London, questioned the absence of photographs of the Skripals in their hospital beds.
His counterpart in Brussels, Vladimir Chizhov, accused Britain of breaking “consular conventions” because Russian officials had not been able to visit the Skripals.
The response to the 2 envoys is so obvious that I can scarcely believe they require instruction. Sergei and Yulia Skripal have been in a coma since 4 March – as you would expect from victims of a nerve agent attack. They cannot give their consent to be photographed or receive visitors. Under the NHS Code of Practice, hospitals must have their patients’ permission before allowing this to happen.
And I will make the point as delicately as possible: it is not obvious that the Skripals, of all patients, would welcome a visit from Russian officials. The Russian state is resorting to its usual strategy of trying to conceal the needle of truth in a haystack of lies and obfuscation.
But when I met my European counterparts in Brussels yesterday, what struck me most is that no-one is fooled. Just about every country represented around the table had been affected by malign or disruptive Russian behaviour. Most had endured the kind of mendacious propaganda onslaught that the UK is experiencing today.
This is how Mr Putin behaves at home; we should not expect anything different abroad.
Boris Johnson
Source
Daily Telegraph (UK), March 19, 2018
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2018/03/19/putins-sinister-threats-lies-extend-far-beyond-country/
Wie soll man diesen Mann noch ernst nehmen ?
Hintergrund:
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
russia-insider.com/en/full-text-boris-johnsons-crazy-daily-telegraph-editorial-short-comment/ri22862
“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.” –Prof. Caroll Quigley, Georgetown University, Tragedy and Hope (1966)
AW: Trump im Fadenkreuz der Medien
Trump jetzt auf Kriegskurs? Neocon-Falke John Bolton wird Nationaler Sicherheitsberater.
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
Damit scheint der Kurs vorgezeichnet. John Bolton ist ungefähr so "nett" wie sein Nachnamensvetter Ramsey Bolton aus der Serie "Game of Thrones".Der härteste Falke im Weißen Haus - John Bolton wird nationaler Sicherheitsberater
Im März 2015 erschien in der New York Times ein Gastbeitrag zur Iran-Politik Barack Obamas. Titel: "Um den Iran von der Bombe abzuhalten, braucht es eine Bombe." Autor der Veröffentlichung war ein gewisser John Bolton.
Bolton wird am 9. April der neue Nationale Sicherheitsberater von US-Präsident Donald Trump. "Eine der radikalsten Stimmen in der amerikanischen Außenpolitik", wie die liberale Nachrichtenseite Vox kommentierte. Bolton kann als außenpolitischer Falke bezeichnet werden. Unter George W. Bush war er ein glühender Verfechter des Einmarsches in den Irak. Seine Auffassungen zum Iran unterscheiden sich in ihrer Härte nicht von denen zu Nordkorea. Präsident Donald Trump versammelt auf entscheidenden Posten auf diese Weise mehr und mehr politische Hardliner um sich.
AW: Trump im Fadenkreuz der Medien
Trumps fanatische Israelliebe wird unser aller Unglück sein.
AW: Trump im Fadenkreuz der Medien
Ich finde die Personalentscheidung sehr interessant.
Fuer mich steht fest, dass der Druck auf das Terrorregime im Iran massiv erhoeht werden wird. Der Irandeal wird aufgekuendigt.
Ich halte es sogar fuer moeglich, dass der Iran seine Truppen aus dem Libanon und Syrien abziehen wird. Der Druck wird einfach zu gross.
Die USA werden wieder eine entscheidende Rolle im Nahen Osten spielen. Die Praesenz von US Truppen in Syrien wird dauerhaft.
Es geht jetzt um das nackte Ueberleben der Mullahs in Teheran.
Bolton may herald rightward shift in Trump’s foreign policy
Former UN ambassador under George W. Bush was strong supporter of Iraq war and advocates regime change in Iran
By Jill Colvin and Zeke Miller
...
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
timesofisrael.com/bolton-may-herald-rightward-shift-in-trumps-foreign-policy/
“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.” –Prof. Caroll Quigley, Georgetown University, Tragedy and Hope (1966)
AW: Trump im Fadenkreuz der Medien
Ich finde, dass Bolton eine gute Wahl ist.
Bolton steht ganz klar fuer regime change in Teheran.
Die Mullahs muessen einlenken, sonst gibt es Krieg.
“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.” –Prof. Caroll Quigley, Georgetown University, Tragedy and Hope (1966)
Aktive Benutzer in diesem Thema: 1 (Registrierte Benutzer: 0, Gäste: 1)
Nutzer die den Thread gelesen haben : 7Du hast keine Berechtigung, um die Liste der Namen zu sehen.
Forumregeln
Mit Zitat antworten
