Amerikanische Abgeordnete diskutieren darüber bei dem nächsten Anschlag in den USA auf dem Niveau des 11.09 Mekkah mit Wasserstoffbomben auszulöschen. Sie versprechen sich davon den Zusammenbruch des Islamischen Glaubens, da ein tägliches fünfmaliges Gebet zu einer heiligen Stätte - die vermeintlich von Allah selbst beschützt wird - und die "intensivly glassified" und für jahrzehnte unbewohnbar gemacht worden wäre als sinnlos und widersinnig anzusehen sei.
Könnte man damit den Djihad ein für alle mal beenden?
Consequences of Nuking Mecca
By: Vernon Richards, author of ‘Islam Undressed‘
Because a war of attrition heavily favors their ultimate goals, Islamist terrorists have so far not been deterred by large numbers of their young men being killed. Life is cheap to them, even their own, and so they remain unmoved by their losses and still lust for power through murder. Their grass-roots support base, billions of Muslims world-wide, can still be counted on to largely support their efforts, even if only passively. If sufficiently humbled, then at some point the majority of Muslims might yet choose to abandon violence and stop their sons, or at least temporarily withdraw their jihadist forces to established realms of influence (just as the Turkish hordes did after being soundly defeated by the Polish cavalry). But any decision to withdraw will not come by either negotiation or accommodation, but only through abject humiliation and defeat. What form of defeat will suffice to convince Islam to put the Jihad genie back in the bottle is a subject of widespread debate. Pacifists blithely claim more therapy, understanding, and multiculturalism is the way, and will likely continue to spout such nonsense right up until the Halal knife slices their throat. They congratulate themselves for being so open-minded, oblivious that their brains have fallen out. Happily self-blinded by excessive relativism, they can no longer distinguish right from wrong, good from evil, or dark from light.
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
und
Why not bomb Mecca? Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-CO) has brought the issue to the table. The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has demanded that he apologize to Muslims, and commentators left and right have subjected him to vociferous criticism. At the same time, however, he seems to have tapped into the frustration that many Americans feel about official Washington’s politically correct insistence, in the face of ever-mounting evidence to the contrary, that Islam is a religion of peace that has been hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists.
[Links nur für registrierte Nutzer]
Medina needs one too, to prevent Arabs from declaring the transference of the holy site to the secondary location, but Mecca needs to be thoroughly ‘glassified’.
Das Wort "glassifed" fasziniert mich!